Phil Ivey v Paul Jackson - Ultimate Bluff v Bluff
23 December 2009Just came across this video while randomly browsing youtube!...Classic!
Phil Ivey v Paul Jackson - Ultimate Bluff v Bluff
![]() |
Click here to get $1000 for free at DoylesRoom Poker | Start pokerweblog? |
Just came across this video while randomly browsing youtube!...Classic!
Phil Ivey v Paul Jackson - Ultimate Bluff v Bluff
So where do I start....
Recently playing online poker as I do on many a night, I won't mention the site, ..had been playing for about 2hrs and to my amazement I was up 800% on my initial $50 starting chips. The table was no-limit Holdem and with blinds of $.50 and $1, with a maximum re-load of $50.
6-player table of which 4 players came and went like pawns, except the guy sitting next to me who seemed to be almost professional, for some reason he always seemed to have just a little more cash then me!
We built up a respect, I got to know his game and visa-versa. If either of us raised the other would fold, or re-raise and then the other fold.
I can't deny, my aggressive streak came out amongst the other 4 players knowing my stack will scare them into folding if I raise, and with some great play (I mean luck) I couldn't lose!
So i'm slowly getting to the point where I should run with my winnings, but im hit with a pair of 99's, so being the last to bet I analyse whats 'the score' ... Three people call the blind, so I call $1 too, with four people in im not gonna risk any cash seeing as im about to leave!
The guy beside me with the highest stack, small blind, raises to $3 which promptly causes everyone else to fold.... so its just me left, with a pair of 99's. I thought maybe he had A 9 or A 10 maybe even A Q so I raised him $7 thinking he would just fold, i'd take the $14 or so and be on my way, but he called!
The Flop : 2 2 4
Great flop I thought, then he instantly bet $14! Many thoughts run through your head at this point, does he have a 2? No he can't have a 2. Pair of 4's? Why would he bet $14 if he had A Q... So seeing as I hade a large stack why not one last hand with him, call and see what the Turn is and see how he acts. So in goes my $14 call...
The Turn : 9!
Wow I got the Full House 9's over 2's. I thought this will be such a nice win to end the day! ... He bets $50!!
Ive Got the second best hand and no way does he have Duce's....I raised $100
He raised $100....
I went All-In...He went all in...$805 pot on the table... I knew by this point he had the pocket 4's and the only card that could beat me was another 4!
River hits!.... Its a 4! He wins with four of a kind .. Four 4's 
My bad luck story!
If you have one it would great to hear it! Then I know its not just me
Poker's popularity experienced an unprecedented spike at the beginning of the 21st century, largely because of the introduction of online poker and hole-card camera, which turned the game into a spectator sport. Viewers could now follow the action and drama of the game, and broadcasts of poker tournaments such as the World Series of Poker and the World Poker Tour brought in huge audiences for cable and satellite TV distributors. Because of the increasing coverage of poker events, poker pros became celebrities, with poker fans all over the world entering into expensive tournaments for the chance to play with them. This increased camera exposure also brings a new dimension to the poker professional's game - the realization that their actions may be aired later on TV.
Since 2003, major poker tournament fields have grown dramatically, in part because of the growing popularity of online satellite-qualifier tournaments where the prize is an entry into a major tournament. The 2003 and 2004 World Series Of Poker champions, Chris Moneymaker and Greg Raymer, respectively, won their seats to the main event by winning online satellites. After the passage of the UIGEA in October of 2006, attendance at live tournaments as well as participation in live and online cash games initially slowed, however they are still growing and far more popular today than they were prior to 2003.